http://ronny.haryan.to/archives/2004/10/09/script-fonts/ Print: $9.50 -- Online: free Tue, 7 Apr 2009 13:01:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://ronny.haryan.to/archives/2004/10/09/script-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-49 Jay Fri, 26 Nov 2004 02:25:34 +0000 http://ronny.haryan.to/archives/2004/10/09/script-fonts/#comment-49 not an odd thing. css-nya font-family: Zapfino, Verdana, sans-serif; jadi kalau browser gak punya Zapfino ya bakal dirender dengan Verdana not an odd thing. css-nya font-family: Zapfino, Verdana, sans-serif;
jadi kalau browser gak punya Zapfino ya bakal dirender dengan Verdana

]]> http://ronny.haryan.to/archives/2004/10/09/script-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-45 sisil Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:21:51 +0000 http://ronny.haryan.to/archives/2004/10/09/script-fonts/#comment-45 This is odd - now the font don't show on Safari! (It's changed to boring verdana bold) The background image shows on Firefox. On IE the tail of both 'y's are covered with the right blue column. This is odd – now the font don’t show on Safari! (It’s changed to boring verdana bold) The background image shows on Firefox. On IE the tail of both ‘y’s are covered with the right blue column.

]]> http://ronny.haryan.to/archives/2004/10/09/script-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-43 sisil Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:24:59 +0000 http://ronny.haryan.to/archives/2004/10/09/script-fonts/#comment-43 Was using Mozzila for Mac. The image shows on safari and IE... I forgot. I'll try opening it up again at work. Was using Mozzila for Mac. The image shows on safari and IE… I forgot. I’ll try opening it up again at work.

]]> http://ronny.haryan.to/archives/2004/10/09/script-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-17 Ronny Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:30:03 +0000 http://ronny.haryan.to/archives/2004/10/09/script-fonts/#comment-17 Sisil, what browser do you use? It's standard CSS, so it should show up on recent standards-compliant browsers supporting CSS. Sisil, what browser do you use? It’s standard CSS, so it should show up on recent standards-compliant browsers supporting CSS.

]]> http://ronny.haryan.to/archives/2004/10/09/script-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-16 sisil Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:47:24 +0000 http://ronny.haryan.to/archives/2004/10/09/script-fonts/#comment-16 They pay attention to details, the Mac people. I can see the font, but there's no background image, unlike the screenshot. They pay attention to details, the Mac people. I can see the font, but there’s no background image, unlike the screenshot.

]]> http://ronny.haryan.to/archives/2004/10/09/script-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-13 Jay Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:04:20 +0000 http://ronny.haryan.to/archives/2004/10/09/script-fonts/#comment-13 Yes, Macintosh good in typeface, even in old version I like New York, Chicago and Monaco fonts :) Yes, Macintosh good in typeface, even in old version I like New York, Chicago and Monaco fonts :)

]]>